Submit an extension

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Tab filter · Esc close

Most-searched Chrome extensions

This is a ranking of Chrome extensions by how often people search for them, not by how many people install them or how good they are. We built it from DataForSEO's US search-volume data, pulled 2026-09-26, matched to extensions we actually review here at Find Extensions.

Last updated

What this ranking measures

This page ranks extensions purely by search demand: how many people typed a query like "{name} chrome extension" or a close brand variant into Google in a given month, according to DataForSEO's US estimates from 2026-09-26.

Search demand, not installs or quality

A high rank here means a lot of people are searching for that extension's name. It says nothing about how many people install it afterward, how well it works, or how it compares on features or trust. For that, read the individual reviews linked below.

We excluded video-downloader, unblocked-games, quiz-hack, paywall-bypass, and adult-content queries from this ranking, and only included extensions we actually have a review for, so every row links somewhere useful.

The ranking

Chrome extensions ranked by top brand-query search volume (US, monthly estimate)
RankExtensionTop queryMonthly US volume
1Grammarlygrammarly for chrome extension22,200
21Passwordchrome extension for 1password14,800
3Dark Readerdark reader chrome extension12,100
4uBlock Origin Litechrome extension ublock origin9,900
5BlockSiteblocksite chrome extension9,900
6Bitwardenbitwarden chrome extension8,100
7ColorZillacolorzilla color picker chrome extension6,600
8OneTabonetab extension chrome5,400
9Momentummomentum extension for chrome4,400
10Todoisttodoist chrome extension3,600
11Loomloom extension for chrome2,900
12Speechifyspeechify chrome extension2,400

Grammarly leads the extensions we review by search demand, but the gap between rank 1 and rank 12 is smaller than you might expect: less than a 10x difference, unlike the huge jumps seen in generic or translation-related queries.

How we built this ranking

We started from the extensions listed in our directory, searched the DataForSEO export for each one's name combined with "chrome extension" and close variants, and kept the single highest-volume query per extension as its representative number.

  1. Pull the full DataForSEO US keyword dataset from 2026-09-26
  2. Filter out video-downloader, unblocked-games, quiz-hack, paywall, and adult-content terms
  3. Match remaining queries against extension names we currently review
  4. Keep the highest-volume matching query per extension as its representative search figure
  5. Rank extensions by that figure, highest to lowest

Why some extensions aren't listed

Several extensions we review, and several very high-volume brand names in the raw dataset, don't appear above. That's intentional, not an oversight.

  • Some extensions we review had no matching query with meaningful, distinct search volume in this dataset
  • Some very high-volume brand names in the raw data, like translation tools, aren't extensions we currently review, so we didn't force a link
  • Ties and near-ties were resolved by keeping the cleanest, most representative query per extension rather than every close variant

Search demand versus quality

It's worth being direct about what this ranking can't tell you. An extension can rank high here simply because it's well known, has a distinctive name, or gets frequently recommended, none of which is the same as being the best tool for your specific need.

For an actual verdict on any extension, read its full review, which covers permissions, pricing, update history, and a plain best-for and not-for summary using the same methodology applied to every listing on the site.

Most-searched Chrome extensions: FAQs

Does this ranking measure how many people install each extension?

No. It measures search volume only, meaning how often people type a query naming that extension into Google each month. Installs, active users, and uninstall rates are entirely separate figures that we don't have access to here.

Where does the search volume data come from?

It comes from a DataForSEO pull covering the US market, dated 2026-09-26. Every figure in the ranking table traces back to that single dataset export rather than any estimate we made independently.

Why is Grammarly ranked first if bigger brand names exist in the raw data?

Some larger brand names in the raw dataset, like translation tools, aren't extensions we currently review, so we excluded them rather than link somewhere without a review. Grammarly leads among the extensions we actually cover.

Is a higher rank here a recommendation to install that extension?

No, it's a measure of search popularity, not a quality signal. Read the linked review for each extension to see its actual verdict, permissions, and pricing before deciding whether it fits what you need.

Why do you exclude video-downloader and similar queries from this ranking?

Those categories, along with unblocked-games, quiz-hack, paywall-bypass, and adult-content terms, fall outside what Find Extensions reviews. Including them would inflate the ranking with searches unrelated to the extensions we actually cover on this site.

How often will this ranking be updated?

This page reflects a DataForSEO pull from 2026-09-26. Search volumes shift gradually over time, so we'll refresh the ranking periodically rather than treating this single snapshot as permanent.

Why does the volume gap between rank 1 and rank 12 look smaller than expected?

Among extensions we actually review, search demand is more evenly spread than the huge jumps you see with generic queries like "chrome extension" itself, which sit in a different, much higher volume tier entirely.

Can an extension's rank change if it gets a new feature or update?

Only indirectly. Search volume tends to follow news coverage, recommendations, and word of mouth more than feature updates on their own, so a new feature might eventually shift volume, but not immediately or predictably.

What does the "top query" column in the table represent?

It's the single highest-volume search phrase we found for that extension in the dataset, usually a variant like "{name} chrome extension" or "chrome extension for {name}", used as that extension's representative search figure.

Is this the same data used in the search data study page?

Yes. Both this ranking and our search data study draw from the same DataForSEO US pull dated 2026-09-26, just organized differently: this page ranks named extensions, the study covers broader query patterns.

Why don't all extensions in your directory appear in this ranking?

Only extensions with a distinct, meaningful matching query in the dataset are included. Some extensions we review simply didn't have enough measurable, extension-specific search volume to rank meaningfully against the others.